1995-01-03 - Re: SAN FRANCISCO EDITORIAL

Header Data

From: Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 35e904cce8070a917aa18336cdf0ebd756e998d25a3dbc5dba171878ff951634
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950103112653.2039A-100000@eskimo.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950103102549.18076G-100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-03 19:28:50 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Jan 95 11:28:50 PST

Raw message

From: Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 95 11:28:50 PST
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: SAN FRANCISCO EDITORIAL
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950103102549.18076G-100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950103112653.2039A-100000@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


The author of this editorial is the Siegel of Cantor and Siegel fame, 
nicht wahr?

Perhaps someone with detailed knowledge of that brouhaha should write the 
Examiner and point out that they allowed their editorial page to be used 
for ex parte pleading by one of the worst offenders in the history of the 
Internet -- and without informing their readers they were doing so.







Thread