cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-01-15 - Re: Data Haven problems

Header Data

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Message Hash: ddd025c08333888ae93d1261b84ceca39649aa6b9cd4fd865702883be9cb258e
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950115101641.725A-100000@xcalibur>
Reply To: <9501090448.AA14477@anchor.ho.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-15 20:46:32 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 Jan 95 12:46:32 PST

Raw message

From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 95 12:46:32 PST
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Subject: Re: Data Haven problems
In-Reply-To: <9501090448.AA14477@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950115101641.725A-100000@xcalibur>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Some sites may only accept encrypted files, which reduces the spam 
> potential considerably, as well as reducing your exposure to the
> porn police, though it's difficult to do anything about files that are
> encrypted with a public key whose private key has been posted to the net,
> or fake crypto headers in an otherwise unencrypted file,

   This is interesting; during the last week or so that I've not been 
current with the list, I've started to implement a data-haven that takes 
information over sockets or MIME e-mail, and requires the use of PGP 
keypairs for the data.  I don't *WANT* to know what data they're 
transferring me.  If digicash would ever reply to one of my applications, 
I could sell it on a digicash/day basis.  Blah.  Neat idea, but the $ 
part is kinda limiting.

-jon

( --------[ Jonathan D. Cooper ]--------[ entropy@intnet.net ]-------- )
( PGP 2.6.2 keyprint: 31 50 8F 82 B9 79 ED C4  5B 12 A0 35 E0 9B C0 01 )
( home page: http://taz.hyperreal.com/~entropy/ ]---[ Key-ID: 4082CCB5 )

Thread