1995-02-09 - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

Header Data

From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
To: N/A
Message Hash: 354792387f9a75985689a527cced1d4d4f9980956ef87b14594f5ec9629dd812
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950209090753.8172B-100000@chewy.wookie.net>
Reply To: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 14:07:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:07:31 PST

Raw message

From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:07:31 PST
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
In-Reply-To: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950209090753.8172B-100000@chewy.wookie.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Timothy C. May wrote:

> As scary as S.314 is, I'm not sure it's likely to pass. Unlike the
> Digital Telephony Bill, which was on greased skids, this  one seems to
> have come out of left field. I could be wrong on this, and maybe it's
> got a lot of sponsors, but it sounds like just another Bill that will
> die in committee or fail on the floor.

I would not count on this. The goal of the bill is to combat 
indecency/pornography/onscenity online - the kind of things pols LOVE to 
vote for.


- dog







Thread