1995-02-13 - Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions

Header Data

From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
To: schneier@chinet.chinet.com
Message Hash: 3abb1f39f4978dd6d7ceea1f74e0d9b6603c6fe2b98bec19a2409679020bc764
Message ID: <199502131750.MAA18574@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>
Reply To: <m0rdnqt-000k5xC@mailbox.mcs.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-13 17:52:55 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 09:52:55 PST

Raw message

From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 09:52:55 PST
To: schneier@chinet.chinet.com
Subject: Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
In-Reply-To: <m0rdnqt-000k5xC@mailbox.mcs.com>
Message-ID: <199502131750.MAA18574@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



My knowledge of number theory is negligable, but I've got this one obvious
comment: use algorithms where factoring is not a weakness.

Isn't LUC safe from factoring?





Thread