1995-02-05 - Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
Message Hash: 402b42d126a754638731fcd7908f17dbc039efdec3cdf82bf747e80fe0231218
Message ID: <9502052119.AA02901@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <m0rb8zF-0009tFC@sdwsys>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-05 21:19:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Feb 95 13:19:33 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 95 13:19:33 PST
To: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
Subject: Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
In-Reply-To: <m0rb8zF-0009tFC@sdwsys>
Message-ID: <9502052119.AA02901@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Stephen D. Williams says:
> In otherwords: Since it looks like we're stuck with visible proxy
> firewalls for the forseeable future, we need to start codifying
> proxy-relay semantics into new protocol preambles.

Or simply codify the firewall techniques, a la the IETF AFT group...

.pm





Thread