1995-02-10 - Re: West (was:HR830 - Anyone tracking this?)

Header Data

From: xpat@vm1.spcs.umn.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4fb35d2e44e0cf963ada763b96733dd697bb4968e8bf67eb3d76d306c536a692
Message ID: <9502102042.AA20803@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 20:42:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:42:13 PST

Raw message

From: xpat@vm1.spcs.umn.edu
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 12:42:13 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: West (was:HR830 - Anyone tracking this?)
Message-ID: <9502102042.AA20803@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>-    House republicans introduce legislation with a section
>     requested by West Publishing that will provide sweeping
>     changes in federal freedom of information act, and prevent
>     federal agencies from creating a public database that use
>     the West Publishing page numbers to reference case law.

Well, the West citation system *is* proprietary, without a doubt.
This is a case where ease-of-use has completely dominated. Court
records are completely laced with West citations.

>-    The "West Provision" would also end its lawsuit with Tax
>     Analyst, a Virginia publisher, who is seeking access to the
>     Department of Justice JURIS database of court decisions in
>     order to put the information into the public domain.  Tax
>     Analysts alleges the JURIS database of court decisions are
>     subject to FOIA and not protected by copyright.  A victory
>     by Tax Analysts in this case will lead to a public domain
>     database of federal court decisions.

The Tax Analyst lawsuit: destined to fail from the start.
If they want to do this they will have to come up with their own
indexing/citation system, and then get everyone to adapt to it.
About as likely as putting 73v AC wiring in every home in America.





Thread