1995-02-09 - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

Header Data

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
To: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Message Hash: 6c61b280a9c1ada70eb42901f7b9e101b9856956fd2d1b7bb46caa307cc4d127
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208211930.24981C-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208204415.11813A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 02:21:35 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:21:35 PST

Raw message

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:21:35 PST
To: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Subject: Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208204415.11813A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208211930.24981C-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Ben wrote:

> On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, root wrote:

> > A friend advises me that today House Bill 666 passed. This supposedly would
> > allow police officers to use evidence collected illegaly if they 'believed'
> > that it was collected in good faith.

> This sounds like a spoof.  Look at the number.

Unfortunately, it is not.  World Wide Web yourself over to 
http://thomas.loc.gov/ and search for hr 666...you will find it.

"A Bill to control crime by exclusionary rule reform..." maybe if 
"control" means "aiding and abetting"

-Thomas






Thread