1995-02-06 - Re: Judge not…

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
To: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Message Hash: 6f5e8f7051dfe0168003f321a580c3b52f5c8bcad471a967b1d14d1e3424597c
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9502052211.A8714-0100000@netcom9>
Reply To: <199502060147.RAA25515@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-06 06:58:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Feb 95 22:58:47 PST

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 95 22:58:47 PST
To: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Subject: Re: Judge not...
In-Reply-To: <199502060147.RAA25515@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9502052211.A8714-0100000@netcom9>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> [...]
> 
> Notification of 
> authorities external to the Net should be avoided. Contacts 
> to the Press should be left to those who have been trained in 
> public relations or have equivalent experience.

Seems thoroughly sane.
 
> How does the Judges' List work?
> 
> The List distributes messages to a panel of Judges who cancel 
> multiple posts to NetNews immediately. The List is used to 
> help Judges organize themselves, finalize policy, and set 
> procedures to enforce rules. It is primarily directed to 
> those who issue cancels.

In other words, it is a list for net vigilantes.

Sounds reasonable to me.  We need net vigilantes and we need
them to talk to each other.

Why should anyone object to this?

Enforcers are self appointed:  How else should anarchy work?
 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          |  
We have the right to defend ourselves     |   http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind     |  
of animals that we are. True law          |   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the     |  
arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.  |   jamesd@netcom.com






Thread