1995-02-10 - Re: MIME based remailing commands

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Message Hash: 723a756abcb841491af30857cacf610e7d087184e023bd705ace68a6b65a69e9
Message ID: <199502101735.JAA18715@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <199502101639.IAA21710@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 17:37:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:37:33 PST

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:37:33 PST
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
In-Reply-To: <199502101639.IAA21710@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <199502101735.JAA18715@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> I think this might be caused by a disagreement between the To: address in
> the message itself and whatever "To" address was passed to sendmail on
> the command line.  If you pass -t to sendmail then it won't look for a
> "To" address on the command line, at least as configured at my site.
> 

	It doesn't matter if they disagree. If you don't have a To:
line in the header then "Apparently-To:" gets tacked on using the "To"
from the envelope.

-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-841-2014
Network Administrator				Pager:	 510-321-1014
Community ConneXion: The NEXUS-Berkeley		Dialin:  510-549-1383
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest")			sameer@c2.org




Thread