1995-02-09 - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

Header Data

From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
To: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Message Hash: 7690538c5f2bd7caeb8f645f17c32cd061bf23c778a232b4d228ece82dd879df
Message ID: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
Reply To: <PiQElKjqRmN1078yn@mirage.skypoint.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 06:35:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:35:58 PST

Raw message

From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:35:58 PST
To: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
In-Reply-To: <PiQElKjqRmN1078yn@mirage.skypoint.com>
Message-ID: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Samuel Kaplin wrote:

> In article <Pine.3.89.9502081135.A7848-0100000@netcom10>, you wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Feb 1995, Samuel Kaplin wrote:
> > > I find it amazing that CPR and EFF
> > > haven't picked this up yet.
> >
> > Really?
> 
> I had at least hoped that they would have their ear to the ground.
> Unfortunately I was wrong. ;(

It's a tough thing for them to be involved enough to know what's going
on, but not so involved as to be a partner in the process.

We mostly all criticized them roundly for the Digital Telephony Bill
(I did too). They seem to have somewhat backed off from this approach,
or so it now appears to many of us. (Caveat:  before this is read by
EFF folks and indignantly denied, I make no claims of what the causal
chain was, what Berman's departure has to do with this, etc. Hence the
"they seem to have" phrasing.)

Anyway, how can we expect them to know about upcoming legislation if
we also despise the "inside the Beltway" mentality?

Frankly, I'd rather have them on our side, helping to fight bad
legislation, than working on the inside of things and thus face
compromise by the whole process.

As scary as S.314 is, I'm not sure it's likely to pass. Unlike the
Digital Telephony Bill, which was on greased skids, this  one seems to
have come out of left field. I could be wrong on this, and maybe it's
got a lot of sponsors, but it sounds like just another Bill that will
die in committee or fail on the floor.

(This is where the D.C.-net people, those who are connected to the
political process, can tell us who's likely to support it and who's
not.)

--Tim May


-- 
..........................................................................
Timothy C. May         | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,  
tcmay@netcom.com       | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
                       | knowledge, reputations, information markets, 
W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA  | black markets, collapse of governments.
Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available.
Cypherpunks list: majordomo@toad.com with body message of only: 
subscribe cypherpunks. FAQ available at ftp.netcom.com in pub/tc/tcmay






Thread