1995-02-08 - Re: skronk

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: “Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
Message Hash: a96a86896cbfaedb56ba431b094fcb1eedbfd3d90b58187ca36f503309421a41
Message ID: <9502081947.AA10312@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <9502081137.ZM28317@warp.mcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-08 19:48:24 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:48:24 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:48:24 PST
To: "Kipp E.B. Hickman" <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
Subject: Re: skronk
In-Reply-To: <9502081137.ZM28317@warp.mcom.com>
Message-ID: <9502081947.AA10312@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I agree with much of what you say until you hit this:

"Kipp E.B. Hickman" says:
> You are right here. However, our observation is that an interesting chunk of
> the world is moving towards using X.509 based certificate infrastructures for
> many things.

Like who? Certainly not the internet standards people, no matter what
certain people might tell you. The X.509 body may still be twitching
but I don't think its heart is beating any longer.

Perry





Thread