1995-02-09 - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c66b777ac853038859219287ce5f63f02d914d4d05d1f382f23d88f260153643
Message ID: <199502090349.TAA24428@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <v01510100ab5f0c4d5b89@[166.84.250.21]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 03:51:32 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:51:32 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:51:32 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
In-Reply-To: <v01510100ab5f0c4d5b89@[166.84.250.21]>
Message-ID: <199502090349.TAA24428@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)

   For a while, we were all convinced that the FCC left all these rules
   impossibly vague on purpose, just so that you didn't even know how to obey
   the law if you wanted to.  Everyone a potential criminal.

Just like the banking world, where it's no secret at all.

Did y'all know there's a separate market segment in the banking
business called "Compliance"?

Eric





Thread