1995-02-03 - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
Header Data
From: nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d509fd9546d94b7788abb21bea57c35e226305ee3f513e3ed00dac1fde401cca
Message ID: <199502031504.HAA15462@tower.techwood.org>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9502022036.D23979-0100000@vern.bga.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-03 15:16:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 07:16:12 PST
Raw message
From: nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 07:16:12 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9502022036.D23979-0100000@vern.bga.com>
Message-ID: <199502031504.HAA15462@tower.techwood.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com> wrote:
> Was this Detweiller's "exponentially growing message"?
Yes.
> Note that requiring pgp wrappers kills this...
No, just encrypt to multiple recipients.
Thread
Return to February 1995
- Return to “Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>”
Return to “nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)”
- 1995-02-03 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:01:19 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
- 1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 07:16:12 PST) - Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet. - nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)