1995-07-20 - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974?

Header Data

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
To: shabbir@panix.com
Message Hash: 2c1b35833fa34c94aae2d6f291e4b48ddf0a454876c69d0ce8b69b6451eefc9b
Message ID: <199507201143.HAA26318@eff.org>
Reply To: <199507192226.SAA10293@panix4.panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-20 11:44:58 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Jul 95 04:44:58 PDT

Raw message

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 95 04:44:58 PDT
To: shabbir@panix.com
Subject: Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974?
In-Reply-To: <199507192226.SAA10293@panix4.panix.com>
Message-ID: <199507201143.HAA26318@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 
Shabbir writes:

> S 974 is a silly bill.  It's like someone went around and made a list
> of all the things that would irk us and then wrote legislation
> around it.
> 
> However this bill isn't immediately going anywhere, and there's more
> dangerous legislation on the floor that is looking a lot like a loaded
> gun.
> 
> VTW is tracking this bill and will put out alerts on it if it becomes
> a more valid threat.  However until then we'll not try to divide the
> forces of the net on bills that aren't yet a serious threat.
> 
> Read the bill, familiarize yourself with the analyses, but let's not
> go running off every time some DC bozo writes a terrible bill.  Especially
> when there isn't even a subcommittee hearing scheduled yet.
> 
> Let's try and do *one thing* at a time.
 
I just want to say: I endorse everything Shabbir says here. 


--Mike








Thread