1995-07-29 - Re: NO reasno whatsoever for the MILITARY to use an intentionally WEAK encryption system. (fwd)

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: “Dr. Frederick B. Cohen” <fc@all.net>
Message Hash: 30e6ab59fa1d8f9fbeb8d95984539b6b562c04c06dd0835c6bb58aa477bfe1f9
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9507291033.A29947-0100000@larry>
Reply To: <9507291131.AA18987@all.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-29 14:19:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 07:19:04 PDT

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 07:19:04 PDT
To: "Dr. Frederick B. Cohen" <fc@all.net>
Subject: Re: NO reasno whatsoever for the MILITARY to use an intentionally WEAK encryption system. (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <9507291131.AA18987@all.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9507291033.A29947-0100000@larry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> 	The DoD does use cryptography extensively, but only to protect
> information worthy of the real costs and complexities

      Another interlocutor whose knowledge of military traffic comes from 
      watching Hollywood movies/TV shows.  Or, maybe he even has access to
      high-level briefings - and believes everything that is said.

      Doc, you might find it instructive to spend a tour in the real world
      of the military. 






Thread