1995-07-30 - Re: The little sex kitten

Header Data

From: “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <erc@khijol.intele.net>
To: David Mandl <dmandl@panix.com>
Message Hash: 4eee3fe720e337701cad4273b0194f1f338d1d98161dc8dd6d15a6e7b3c90105
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9507291922.A25503-0100000@khijol>
Reply To: <v01530501ac4040bb01c2@[166.84.250.21]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-30 01:48:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 18:48:51 PDT

Raw message

From: "Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]" <erc@khijol.intele.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 18:48:51 PDT
To: David Mandl <dmandl@panix.com>
Subject: Re: The little sex kitten
In-Reply-To: <v01530501ac4040bb01c2@[166.84.250.21]>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9507291922.A25503-0100000@khijol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 29 Jul 1995, David Mandl wrote:

> The tightwad, privacy-loathing scumbags I work for sprang just such a
> document on us recently, and after squirming and bitching about it for a
> while, I actually did sign, simply because I wasn't prepared to lose my job
> at that point.  My fear, based on well-established tradition, is that
> eventually this will become widespread and more and more employers will
> monitor email, with coerced "consent."

That's OK - just use PGP :)
--
Ed Carp, N7EKG    			Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com
801/534-8857 voicemail			801/460-1883 digital pager
Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key		an88744@anon.penet.fi

Q.	What's the trouble with writing an MS-DOS program to emulate Clinton?
A.	Figuring out what to do with the other 639K of memory.






Thread