From: Eric Anderson <ericande@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 22:28:17 PDT
To: rick hoselton <hoz@univel.telescan.com>
Subject: Re: Govt mandated key
In-Reply-To: <9507190503.AA05987@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950718221833.16687A-100000@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Tue, 18 Jul 1995, rick hoselton wrote:

> If I have to pay for each key that I use, then
> I have a particular key in mind for my one time 
> pad.  It's a single (trancendental) number that 
> starts with a decimal point.  It's the binary 
> equivalent of the decimal number:
> 
> .012345678910111213141516171819202122......
> 
> I promise to only use this one key, and I'll just
> select a random offset into it for each message.
> 
> Rick F. Hoselton  (who doesn't claim to present opinions for others)
> 
> 
I wouldn't register my keys and I don't think ANY of us should either.
If they threatened me W/ RICO, I would probably register *A* key but 
certainly not one I EVER indended to actually use.
In a case like this I think massive civil disobediance would be a good 
response.
I would like to see a campaign of sending PGP to random Euros or whoever 
has a foriegn tag through anon. remailers.Like this UU encode it and daisy
chain it to whoever.
How's that sound?
Eric