1995-08-01 - Re: U.S. Banks are not all that bad

Header Data

From: Michael Froomkin <Michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
To: cman@communities.com
Message Hash: 3a4f1f0af3c23fccc03204c1509aca907fd2521d716ac157b6b72c35e3bb5583
Message ID: <2925@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-01 01:35:52 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 31 Jul 95 18:35:52 PDT

Raw message

From: Michael Froomkin <Michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 95 18:35:52 PDT
To: cman@communities.com
Subject: Re: U.S. Banks are not all that bad
Message-ID: <2925@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <v02120d01ac4219a2e38e@[199.2.22.120]> Douglas Barnes writes:
> 
...
> 
> I must say that I've had some absolutely amazingly bad experiences
> with banks in Asia, Mexico and Central America, so I'm a skeptic
> when it comes to assuming that non-US banks are light years better.

The U.K. banks make the U.S. look awfully good....

> Although I have no direct experience of European banking, I do know that
> the European banking industry, taken as a whole, is substantially
> behind the US banking industry in automation and efficiency. Most of

Oh yes oh yes oh yes...and I've banked with Lloyds on and off 
for 12 years...
> 
....
-- 
Michael Froomkin                   until Aug 6: michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk
U.Miami School of Law                                     London, England
mfroomki@umiami.ir.miami.edu <-- this will still find me
PO Box 248087 Coral Gables, FL 33124-8087 "Rain in parts, then dry" --BBC
See http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/6095/articles/froomkin-metaphor/text.html





Thread