1995-08-24 - Re: Let Me Repeat, the Raids Must Be Stopped! A PROFOUND THREAT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH ON THE INTERNET

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3afbdf7b1018e5d47f1ae7afe4c7ba073667aa37b8123c2a1a33cd9de31c76bc
Message ID: <9508241549.AA23185@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <9508241527.AA06465@all.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-24 15:51:03 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 08:51:03 PDT

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 08:51:03 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Let Me Repeat, the Raids Must Be Stopped! A PROFOUND THREAT TO  FREEDOM OF SPEECH ON THE INTERNET
In-Reply-To: <9508241527.AA06465@all.net>
Message-ID: <9508241549.AA23185@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I think its simpler than that, a judge simply needs to look at the facts of the 
case, declare the warrants to be void, order the property returned and require 
payment of the 4.7 Million to Wollerstein before the courts will consider the 
matter further.

The problem seems to be that the US courts don't have the balls to deal with this 
type of behaviour.




Thread