1995-08-01 - Re: U.S. Banks are not all that bad

Header Data

From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@sensemedia.net>
Message Hash: 417bd51e822f3f9d541f1a7cf3e3a0598c263d4cb95ecdd111689c41dec7d9b3
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9507312239.B21268-0100000@jake.bga.com>
Reply To: <ac419fc0000210046951@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-01 03:44:59 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 31 Jul 95 20:44:59 PDT

Raw message

From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 95 20:44:59 PDT
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@sensemedia.net>
Subject: Re: U.S. Banks are not all that bad
In-Reply-To: <ac419fc0000210046951@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9507312239.B21268-0100000@jake.bga.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I might have missed the beginning of this thread, but noting the 
complaints that Lucky Green has made, I would submit that he may be 
dealing with a bank in deep financial straights.  The outrageous actions 
he charges follow exactly a pattern noted here in Austin a few years 
ago.  (During the S&L crisis.)  When banks start charging significant 
fees for mundane transactions, hit the exits at a run!  Ignore the major 
rating agencies, as they get their money from the banks. ;-)

IANAFA

Nathan






Thread