1995-08-24 - Re: Brute SSL Challenge

Header Data

From: Brian Lane <blane@eskimo.com>
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Message Hash: 420ad4fb722f95ecbba4551586c7bf5e7cea38148543873090467713dc9448f4
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950824122951.12822D-100000@eskimo.com>
Reply To: <9157.9508240731@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-24 19:36:21 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 12:36:21 PDT

Raw message

From: Brian Lane <blane@eskimo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 12:36:21 PDT
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Brute SSL Challenge
In-Reply-To: <9157.9508240731@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950824122951.12822D-100000@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 24 Aug 1995 aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk wrote:

> You wouldn't happen to have gcc under DOS would you?
> 
> Or anyone else with djgcc for DOS?
> 
> What would be really nice would be a 32 bit DOS executable, which is
> very hard to obtain with any PC software, and compiling it 16 bit
> suffers a huge performance hit.
> 
> In search of a 32 bit DOS binary,

  In the same vein, a 32 bit OS2 version would be nice.

  I'm not sure how brutessl works exactly, but if it could connect to the 
server, get its key assignments, and then chug away while disconnected 
from the net I could see what kind of speed I get out of my 40MHz 486.

   Brian





Thread