1995-08-30 - Re: Pre-allocating key segments

Header Data

From: ab411@detroit.freenet.org (David R. Conrad)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b698d3cf4c1b84da1c499b2004302a19e1abdda49a7f6e8878719b2d79928728
Message ID: <199508300039.UAA07603@detroit.freenet.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-30 00:39:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Aug 95 17:39:40 PDT

Raw message

From: ab411@detroit.freenet.org (David R. Conrad)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 95 17:39:40 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Pre-allocating key segments
Message-ID: <199508300039.UAA07603@detroit.freenet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




This was supposed to go out yesterday, but I mistyped the address.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk> writes:
>I wrote:
>> ... but I still think the
>> prefetching of some more segments would be useful.
>
>I'm seeing calls from calpoly.edu and albany.net taking less than a second.
>Are you **REALLY** worried about wasting that sort of time, when even a single
>segment usually takes a quarter of an hour even on the faster machines ?

Wow, I knew it had been sped up, but I didn't realize...
You've convinced me.  :-)

>[ Getting down to the implementation details
>  1) it would be hard for brloop to know that brutessl is 3/4s done.
>  2) I can't think how to do prefetching in a safe way, and without disc use
>]

Good points.  Never mind the pre-allocation.

Abashed,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMEKVMREcrOJethBVAQENBQP5AeM1crT8+fqAkWKtFPQHi+ljbP2cwnIy
36jcC4WCQVdKtor5hZZu+0yfyENAirGI6SKFesJFrRi9avMHmOYTo2QTvnhZQYy/
patw2wRXDwrfWY6ndklmssROM59pLhZmngkMlIzEd1QVrmy2YGbKnJOvzIrUwaYL
rGzztIzvLVo=
=UAte
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
David R. Conrad, ab411@detroit.freenet.org, http://www.grfn.org/~conrad
Finger conrad@grfn.org for PGP 2.6 public key; it's also on my home page
Key fingerprint =  33 12 BC 77 48 81 99 A5  D8 9C 43 16 3C 37 0B 50
Jerry Garcia, August 1, 1942 - August 9, 1995.  Requiescat in pace.





Thread