1995-08-06 - Re: NRC Panel, Law Enforcement questions

Header Data

From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
To: gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore)
Message Hash: ee1e637c5a74164c4338ee1ad154a52793e0888038f3e41b0e717ceb44d0a85c
Message ID: <199508061016.UAA14365@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Reply To: <9508020134.AA07797@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-06 10:16:44 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Aug 95 03:16:44 PDT

Raw message

From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 95 03:16:44 PDT
To: gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore)
Subject: Re: NRC Panel, Law Enforcement questions
In-Reply-To: <9508020134.AA07797@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199508061016.UAA14365@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Hello cypherpunks@toad.com
  and John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>

... [Questions] ...
> How many subpoenas for telephone billing records are made by Federal
... Eg.
> "50% fishing expedition, 22% the subject is in custody for a crime
> (break down by which crimes), 5% the subject is suspected of a crime
> (break down), 10% the subject is not suspected of a crime but there
> may be evidence of someone else's crime in their phone records".
...

What are the other 13% for?


Thanks for a realistic sample answer anyway :-)

Jiri
--
If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>.
On sweeney, I may delete without reading!
PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two)




Thread