1995-09-20 - Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)

Header Data

From: iagoldbe@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ian Goldberg)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1398b635da9deb878f7dde41b4fdd0d82586b89a38e996c0444f4d43ee7ef943
Message ID: <43o23b$91r@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Reply To: <9509191929.AA15153@cs.umass.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-20 03:34:28 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Sep 95 20:34:28 PDT

Raw message

From: iagoldbe@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ian Goldberg)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 95 20:34:28 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <9509191929.AA15153@cs.umass.edu>
Message-ID: <43o23b$91r@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <9509191929.AA15153@cs.umass.edu>,
L. McCarthy <cypherpunks@toad.com> wrote:
>Confirming suspicions that PrivaSoft is a security-through-obscurity outfit:
>
>> From: David Clavadetscher <clav@deltanet.com>
>> Subject: Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
>> 
>> Dear L.,
>> 
>> At this time our crypto engine is patented and proprietary. If you tell me
>> the intent of your interest I will see what other information we can provide
>> to you. Call me if you like.
>[...]

Waitasec...  I was under the impression that if you patented it, you had to
reveal it.  That's why RC4 isn't patented (it used to be a trade secret).

   - Ian "IANAL yadda yadda"





Thread