1995-09-24 - Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape

Header Data

From: “Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]” <khijol!erc>
To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Message Hash: 1a5a4d04991244a92b719d77c8e943be7d32e3bcadc092744cf8cf5fcb445036
Message ID: <199509242029.PAA02731@khijol>
Reply To: <199509232229.SAA00612@nrk.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-24 20:45:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Sep 95 13:45:22 PDT

Raw message

From: "Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]" <khijol!erc>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 95 13:45:22 PDT
To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Subject: Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
In-Reply-To: <199509232229.SAA00612@nrk.com>
Message-ID: <199509242029.PAA02731@khijol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> As a hardware type, I'd prefer a diode noise generator over a
> radioactivity detector. I'd hate for the Fort to be tempted to fudge the
> latter's output by flooding my house from a black helicopter...

No, they'll just flood it with RF and force your diode to act as a 
detector - then they can feed you anything they like ;)

I learned the hard way - keep the transmitters away from a reverse-biased 
doide acting as a noise generator.  Only until I examined the output did 
I realize it wasn't random.  I fixed it, though, by looking at the output
and testing its randomness.
- --
Ed Carp, N7EKG    			Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com
					214/993-3935	voicemail/pager
Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key		an88744@anon.penet.fi

Q.	What's the trouble with writing an MS-DOS program to emulate Clinton?
A.	Figuring out what to do with the other 639K of memory.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMGW/mSS9AwzY9LDxAQGc4gQAjwszSdrT188RrvbTnp9ywwJ99ppixEef
V9m59O169LIh4YwIejicJbO7/zC5t99gs15ZnbTWXZim8r+04XrR3AFyRnQFTDfJ
WmYmW6gHWR40xBxgVMFUydz9TsZqCxGb+iVQRTeteodgMr6x+zbJ0qa8FWy4UNLr
iYfFbjH+okg=
=Qv+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Thread