From: "Rev. Ben" <samman-ben@CS.YALE.EDU>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 95 18:58:20 PDT
To: Den of CryptoAnarchists <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Basic Public key algorithms.
In-Reply-To: <199509030031.UAA29612@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.950902215716.16072A-100000@FROG.ZOO2.CS.YALE.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 2 Sep 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> > > No, because one patent covers public key cryptography itself, and not
> > > a particular method.
> > 
> > Point of information--I'm not flaming you Perry, but Public Key Partners 
> > claims that their patent covers all forms of Public Key Crypto.
> 
> How is this at all different from what I just said?

It isn't.  I just misread what you wrote.

Mea culpa.

Ben.
____
Ben Samman..............................................samman@cs.yale.edu
I have learned silence from the talkative, toleration from the intolerant,
and kindness from the unkind; yet, strange, I am ungrateful to those 
teachers.-- K. Gibran. SUPPORT THE PHIL ZIMMERMANN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND!
For information Email: zldf@clark.net       http://www.netresponse.com/zldf  
PGP encrypted mail welcomed--finger samman@cs.yale.edu for public key


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Auto-signed with Bryce's Auto-PGP v1.0beta3

iQB1AwUBMEkLmL5ALmeTVXAJAQHotAL/bW9tN3Lf+9ATx8ks0s8kz8O3zTikverx
y9bJfsQRaoDtJkNmeiFPBSCIl9q27OIdpN4tyExmFztJVgEdxRYcqZ19ZcXVDRpI
B//GwQQ45JXl1ZKurT0cr2poIecCAFuE
=/0J/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----