From: "David C. Lambert" <dcl@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 13:36:37 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
Message-ID: <199509152013.QAA18005@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Peter Trei <trei@process.com> wrote:

>      Terms like 'cypherpunk' and 'cryptoanarchy' tend to pigeonhole us as
> nutcases for many people, and are a barrier to getting our ideas
> across. I'm not saying this pigeonholing is correct - in fact I despise
> people who judge a book by it's cover, but so many people DO make such
> snap judgements that we need to take this into account when talking to
> the general public.

Two of the responses to the "An opportunity..." post unapologetically
admitted that they refused to read the text of the message due to the
presence of the word "cypherpunk" in the first sentence.

Shows you what we're up against.

BTW, I'm not for changing the name of the list, but I do see the logic
in a more establishment-friendly name to use when lobbying the public.

David C. Lambert
dcl@panix.com
(finger for PGP public key)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMFneAqpplsfgM88VAQE+5wP9GZrIoComyFDeQ6brTLJwZ2oamry3IfC7
XhlqMlAZnC2b1w521nm085nZKtO9/Ru9Fw3BllPinG8nGcBggr9zkH4Ba+Zbezh0
FKK29d7wFGQz1d5JfyYCZhl4dTBdbpnU4jd5Rb27XtvP9livAeR/HIwNAJMccSCX
qO/kxlVRRZg=
=1Lxr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----