1995-09-21 - Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 721af9c6706e001985c2fa7a6ac579bcfb5627e73fa4e8e4edccd26794e701de
Message ID: <199509211907.MAA18413@ix.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-21 19:07:47 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 12:07:47 PDT

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 12:07:47 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
Message-ID: <199509211907.MAA18413@ix.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 02:50 PM 9/20/95 -0700, you wrote:
> In this sense, NSA ought to be *encouraging* Intel and
>IBM and Motorola to put "generate random bits" instructions into
>their instruction sets...

Is _that_ what was going on with Pentium division?  
Less seriously, thoguh, a UART might be a good place to add a random
number source, since it may be able to extract randomness from communication
line jitter, is usually an easily replaceable part on most machines,
and communicates at a higher speed than you're likely to need for
most randomness applications.

#---
# Bill Stewart, Freelance Information Architect, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# Phone +1-510-247-0664 Pager/Voicemail 1-408-787-1281
#---






Thread