1995-09-24 - Re: Netscape for Linux?

Header Data

From: Jeff Simmons <jsimmons@goblin.punk.net>
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
Message Hash: 75ffa08a915018b492c854af748ee2fd7d8ebba63a371999805a111b99211862
Message ID: <199509241746.KAA01423@goblin.punk.net>
Reply To: <199509240436.VAA28304@ix5.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-24 17:50:36 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Sep 95 10:50:36 PDT

Raw message

From: Jeff Simmons <jsimmons@goblin.punk.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 95 10:50:36 PDT
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
Subject: Re: Netscape for Linux?
In-Reply-To: <199509240436.VAA28304@ix5.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199509241746.KAA01423@goblin.punk.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On September 23, Bill Stewart wrote:

> 
> Foo.  Supporting applications in a professional way on Linux is _tough_;
> 
              <Disparaging comments about Linux deleted>

As a Linux user and advocate, I've gotta agree here.  I'm glad that
Netscape is going to continue to supply us with an unsupported binary,
and I can't blame them a bit for not wanting to support an OS where
every user has his own private version number ... would be nice if we
could get 128 bit keys, though ... (hint, hint).

As for your other comments about Linux - would you care to take off your
coat and meet me in Comp.os.flamewars sometime?  ;-)

-- 
Jeff Simmons                           jsimmons@goblin.punk.net




Thread