1995-09-16 - (noise) Re: SPAM bait

Header Data

From: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 76e69d6f0dbab6a740c53513c5924ba8cdae7ef34591d00a955eb84a3bb218c9
Message ID: <199509161913.PAA55049@tequesta.gate.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-16 19:17:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Sep 95 12:17:20 PDT

Raw message

From: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 95 12:17:20 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: (noise) Re: SPAM bait
Message-ID: <199509161913.PAA55049@tequesta.gate.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


nobody@alpha.c2.org (Anonymous) wrote:

<snip>
>
>Don't worry, "Janet Dove", or actually sanghi3@grfn.org got mailbombed
>severely for this one.  I'm just glad he doesn't know how to use remailers.

Good going, Anonymous. What I don't understand about inappropriate
SPAMs like that one (or telephone ads) is; what's the business
incentive to do it? I assume that no Cypherpunk has subscribed to
"Janet's" magazines, and I know that no Ray has _EVER_ spent
money over a telephone unless we initiated the call, yet *still*
we get unwanted calls every once-in-a-while. WHY? [Please respond
privately to liberty@gate.net ]
JMR






Thread