1995-09-27 - Re: Coercion-proof remailers (solved?)

Header Data

From: Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
To: inglem@adnetsol.com (Mike Ingle)
Message Hash: b268f443b4225e82a28ac035563a1993e6fb3dfcf43cde318c32c40bba860199
Message ID: <199509270626.CAA13654@clark.net>
Reply To: <199509270552.WAA00475@cryptical.adnetsol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-27 06:26:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 23:26:40 PDT

Raw message

From: Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 23:26:40 PDT
To: inglem@adnetsol.com (Mike Ingle)
Subject: Re: Coercion-proof remailers (solved?)
In-Reply-To: <199509270552.WAA00475@cryptical.adnetsol.com>
Message-ID: <199509270626.CAA13654@clark.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




  This idea is similar to an approach I posted a month or so ago
entitled "anonymous name resolution" which uses shamir sharing
to break up the recipient's address so that there is no first remailer
to coerce.

  The idea is that you should not deliver to e-mail addresses on
the remailer network, but to "handles", these handles will be
distributed across a DNS-like system that splits up the handles
using shamir sharing. No server stores the handle->email mapping,
but the whole network can perform the mapping. Remailers don't deliver
the message to the final destination, but deliver pieces of the
message to the anonymous name resolver network which perform the
final delivery.

-Ray




Thread