From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 95 00:44:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
Message-ID: <199509090742.AA15129@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Andrew Loewenstern writes:

> > Modemac writes:
> >  Mr. Wollersheim has stated that he will go to jail before he reveals
> >  his encryption key.
> [...snip...]
> >  Call this one: BIG WIN FOR PGP!
> 
> Could this be it?  The test case for forced key disclosure?  The  
> Scientologists seem very determined and already have a grudge against  
> Wollersheim (according to a web page I saw Co$ owes him several million from  
> a settlement).  Has Co$ filed against Wollersheim over this yet?
> 
> If this does go to court and forcing Wollersheim to reveal the key becomes a  
> central issue, is this the test case "we" want?  Is this a "BIG WIN FOR PGP!"  
> or not?

Well, since it's (apparently) a civil case against Wollersheim, the 
potential Fifth Amendment self-incrimination issues may be murkier, so 
this may not be a good test case for the criminal context. In federal civil
trials, material reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence is discoverable unless there's an applicable privilege - this
means that in a civil case, a defendant may be forced to hand over material
likely to expose them to liabilty. (The Fifth Amendment privilege against
criminal self-incrimination still applies).

I'm not sure that key disclosure will even be necessary - the Church
(or whatever annoying tentacle of it is suing Wollersheim) is entitled
to, for example, "a copy of . . . all documents, data compilations, and
tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the party
that are relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in 
the pleadings" (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)). I don't see why
Wollersheim couldn't comply with the discovery rules by providing 
plaintext copies of all relevant information, unless for some reason
the passphrase is itself relevant.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMFFFG33YhjZY3fMNAQGmLAP/S412cBRTRFRWou6mVjh7jbT9O3CIUPEB
oFuDLNy7pQR2ZaR5JOzSsCv9d96CpGdVjIWUxhP/Fz6tN3ZP7LuCXBssoIuiyuEp
z2e+LQthjcksUDqipR+QggIhN3hU66esg14WCF61yjwpXCukn13cOISYtBHRjc9g
sEiN0SXZ4tw=
=knU6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----