1995-09-22 - Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!

Header Data

From: jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b4d4f1e47777bf910d00c3196b86586f3459bec85943d29cbe12ecd54f2b629e
Message ID: <43tvj4$t7v@tera.mcom.com>
Reply To: <199509220830.EAA13828@clark.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-22 09:29:06 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 02:29:06 PDT

Raw message

From: jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 02:29:06 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
In-Reply-To: <199509220830.EAA13828@clark.net>
Message-ID: <43tvj4$t7v@tera.mcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <199509220836.EAA14476@clark.net>, rjc@clark.net (Ray Cromwell) writes:
> Disregard that last message. Those drugs I was taking must have just kicked
> in. I was running another program in the background which coincidentally
> brought up an xterm at the same time I clicked on the link. Damn,
> and I thought I had found another bug. Ah well. There's probably one lurking
> there somewhere. It was good while it lasted. When I hit "send" and
> that xterm popped up, I almost jumped out of my seat. ;-) Remember
> this lesson, you should always try to repeat your bugs atleast three
> times. ;-)

  Thanks for quickly posting this retraction.  For the record, netscape
talks SMTP directly, and does not run an external program to send mail.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread