From: cme@acm.org
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 95 15:19:00 PDT
To: jya@pipeline.com
Subject: Re: Key Escrow Papers
In-Reply-To: <199509082016.NAA22536@comsec.com>
Message-ID: <9509082216.AA12075@tis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 20:55:49 -0400

>   Note 1: It was Michael Nelson of the White House who said
>   that the reason to maintain the 64-bit limit for export was
>   because the key escrow methodology had not yet been proven
>   reliable and that the security agencies insisted on the
>   relatively weak system in case key escrow failed.

Clint Brooks of NSA repeated this assertion, at least once.  He said it
during the August 17, 1995 meeting as well.

I find this interesting, not least as a violation of security.  This
amounts to an open declaration that NSA can break through 64-bit keys.

Could it be that NSA was miffed at being upstaged in the announcement of
breaking through a 40-bit key and wanted to up the ante? .... :-)

 - Carl

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison    cme@acm.org    http://www.clark.net/pub/cme/home.html  |
|PGP: E0414C79B5AF36750217BC1A57386478 & 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2  |
|  ``Officer, officer, arrest that man!  He's whistling a dirty song.''    |
+----------------------------------------------------------- Jean Ellison -+