1995-09-21 - Re: Is the book Network Security any good?

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org (Hallam@w3.org)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bfcfaa392e2be2d366096c800d934991a558dc56a6d07612c270e0ffe13b0ac6
Message ID: <9509201546335370@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-21 00:18:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 17:18:04 PDT

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org (Hallam@w3.org)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 17:18:04 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Is the book Network Security any good?
Message-ID: <9509201546335370@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Date: Wed, 30 Aug 95 22:53:49 -0400
From: hallam@w3.org


>Has anyone read the book "Network Security Private Communication in a 
>PUBLIC World" yet?  It's by Charlie Kaufman, Radia Perlman, and Mike
>Speciner, and has a copyright date of this year.

Its pretty good on security and structure of protocols. Makes a good companion 
the Schneier book. I use it frequently.

It does have some very irritating assertions concerning ASN.1 however, 
specifically concerning its use in Kerberos. I consider Kerberos's use of ASN.1
to be far superior than the alternative suggested which is pure lossage. 
Lambasting the use of ASN.1 is fair game but arguments over wasted bytes miss t
point of ASN.1 and the BER encoding entirely.

It would make a usefull course book. 

        Phill






Thread