1995-09-07 - Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.

Header Data

From: “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d1a1723167f83548f5acce694dbe49e8aeeb822cf0a002a2204460ff790bd503
Message ID: <9509072042.AA20013@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-07 20:42:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 13:42:48 PDT

Raw message

From: "Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 13:42:48 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
Message-ID: <9509072042.AA20013@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> >"If keys are escrowed, what purpose does a 64 bit limit serve?"

> This question was asked, it seems like a zillion times, but
> probably no more than four or five times.
 
> It is a bit of a belt and suspenders idea. But it also shows how
> scared they are about real encryption.

Is there an actual quote - did an identifiable government person actually 
use the 'belt and suspenders' line? This is getting to the point where 
journalists could have something to hang a story on.

I think we can infer from this that the USG has, or soon expects to have, 
the ability to brute 64 bits of key.

> It is clear that this meeting is a shame. Everyone in industry
                                                           ^^^^^^^^
A shame certainly, but I suspect you meant 'sham' (not a spelling flame, 
the difference in meaning is important).
 
> Pat
>

Peter Trei
Senior Software Engineer
Purveyor Development Team                                
Process Software Corporation
http://www.process.com
trei@process.com





Thread