1995-09-03 - Re: Direct Socket to Remailer?

Header Data

From: Cybie@cris.com
To: loki@obscura.com (Lance Cottrell)
Message Hash: e3166f199c5255e163c697bf1b2c9bd86f9ae75c8f6afe97a3332a779e6df0fa
Message ID: <9509030907.AA04231@mariner.cris.com>
Reply To: <ac6da5d1010210040573@[137.110.24.250]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-03 09:07:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 02:07:59 PDT

Raw message

From: Cybie@cris.com
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 02:07:59 PDT
To: loki@obscura.com (Lance Cottrell)
Subject: Re: Direct Socket to Remailer?
In-Reply-To: <ac6da5d1010210040573@[137.110.24.250]>
Message-ID: <9509030907.AA04231@mariner.cris.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> At 7:25 PM 9/1/95, ROBO Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
> >I've heard of telnetting to port 25 to send SEMI-untraceable e-mail.
> >The procedure, quite frankly, sounds rather complicated.
> >
> 
> You should try the telnet port 25 trick. It is amazingly simple (but not
> secure). Just "telnet some.machine.com 25" and type help. It will guide you
> through it. It is quite informative.
> 
>         -Lance

Before you do it, make sure your ISP doesn't mind you telneting to port 25.
VCU's computer dept. doesn't take to kindly to it.  They're worried about 
people sending forged e-mail.  (I was tempted to tell the guy when I got 
caught doing it that they should put a copy of PGP online for folks to use.
But I just wanted my account re-instated.)





Thread