1995-09-18 - Re: Code of Law

Header Data

From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
To: hallam@w3.org
Message Hash: e42c237d9f9df543c0f992b6337f6ac0d32ace8f2d98716590b7579004ce56ec
Message ID: <199509181837.LAA01709@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <9509181534.AA10941@zorch.w3.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-18 18:37:55 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Sep 95 11:37:55 PDT

Raw message

From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 95 11:37:55 PDT
To: hallam@w3.org
Subject: Re: Code of Law
In-Reply-To: <9509181534.AA10941@zorch.w3.org>
Message-ID: <199509181837.LAA01709@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



| >"The basic idea behind the movement," says
| >University of Oregon history professor Richard Brown, "is
| >'popular sovereignty,' that people are above the law.
| >These people are alienated from the legal system. To some
| >extent it sounds like they're also trying to settle
| >personal scores."

I suddenly got very cold.

I thinnk the world has seen enough of 'revolutionary justice',
both in the Soviet Union; there are some fascinating passages
of Lenin about avoiding the bourgouise invented 'justice' concept, 
and that the revolution was well 'above' that whole thing,

and im Germany.

And I guess in current China.

When the people and the govering establishement has lost contact
this much, you're in for trouble.

(Ok, remember I'm a dumb Swede, that still happens to believe that
State and People doesn't have to be enemies. And I do believe in a
sensible dialog between different interest groups etc etc. Flame
away, I'm just dumb anyway. ;-))

/Christian





Thread