1995-09-20 - Re: netscape’s response

Header Data

From: “Jeff Weinstein” <jsw@netscape.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: e889ccc8566fe709d6a5644bd3707f8ac43b3353ee0033555042dd52ffd38ce0
Message ID: <9509200055.ZM206@tofuhut>
Reply To: <ac85072c28021004746c@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-20 07:58:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 00:58:27 PDT

Raw message

From: "Jeff Weinstein" <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 00:58:27 PDT
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: netscape's response
In-Reply-To: <ac85072c28021004746c@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <9509200055.ZM206@tofuhut>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  Just a clarification of my last message.  I didn't mean to imply that
we didn't know about using time/position from mouse events, RFC 1750,
reading from the microphone.  I knew all about this stuff, but made
the fatal mistake of assuming that what we shipped in 1.1 was
"good enough", and that I could look at it later, after I had dealt
with a bunch of other stuff that needed to be done.

  So far I've received several very thoughtful replies, with lots of good
suggestions, most of which I already knew about, but some new ones too.

  Thanks to those who have responded already, and also to those who
will respond.  I'm sorry, but I can't guarantee an individual response...

	--Jeff


-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread