1995-10-05 - Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: hallam@w3.org
Message Hash: 1544fb0ba89a31a868306d83c6888f586c64c24147ebd48717fc35af8bde6938
Message ID: <199510050138.VAA03661@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <9510031505.AA11622@zorch.w3.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-05 01:39:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Oct 95 18:39:02 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 95 18:39:02 PDT
To: hallam@w3.org
Subject: Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
In-Reply-To: <9510031505.AA11622@zorch.w3.org>
Message-ID: <199510050138.VAA03661@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



hallam@w3.org writes:
> 
> There are plenty of other quantum phenomena which can be
> tapped. Essentially all one needs to do is to build a very high gain
> amplifier "baddly". The main difficulty is removing bias.

The main difficulty is that it is extremely hard to prove to yourself
that you are amplifying a quantum phenomenon and not deterministic
noise from the rest of the circuits in the machine or outside it. As
I've said repeatedly, its nearly impossible to get this wrong with a
radiation detecting mechanism, but its very very hard to get it right
with most common mechanisms.

Perry





Thread