1995-10-03 - Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
Message Hash: 54c2357f783d294d3e36676b22a91469ea0c75d64b6ed6802e9cdb0cb2090afb
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951002225219.7461A-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <199510030445.AAA29715@frankenstein.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-03 05:55:17 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 22:55:17 PDT

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 22:55:17 PDT
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
In-Reply-To: <199510030445.AAA29715@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951002225219.7461A-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 3 Oct 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
> Radio signals can be interfered with or listened to -- never
> underestimate the opponent. Computer interfaced radiation detectors,
> in spite of Tim's claim to the contrary, are pretty cheap and very
> hard to interfere with.

What about a beam of high intensity ionising radiation aimed at the 
detector? Since we're dealing with lo intensity sources, this could force
the RNG into a small part of its range. Beware of black helicopters 
carrying cyclotrons :-)

Simon





Thread