1995-10-25 - Re: Does your software?

Header Data

From: Andy Brown <asb@nexor.co.uk>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6b26828033c4d79899e7e7a53081e58bd76074d3c0d6dbcf1f4f4db766d956f5
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951025132835.16584C-100000@eagle.nexor.co.uk>
Reply To: <9510241747.AA02533@all.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-25 13:33:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 06:33:11 PDT

Raw message

From: Andy Brown <asb@nexor.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 06:33:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Does your software?
In-Reply-To: <9510241747.AA02533@all.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951025132835.16584C-100000@eagle.nexor.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Dr. Frederick B. Cohen wrote:

> Actually, not true.  The global fixed-length buffers, shared variables,
> and lack of prototypes provide protection against allocation problems
> which sould result in denial of service, corruptions at near-capacity
> load, and other similar security problems.

Please explain how a lack of prototypes (and shared variables for that 
matter) provide protection against the problems you describe.


- Andy





Thread