1995-10-28 - Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act

Header Data

From: cjs@netcom.com (cjs)
To: BELL@odo.law.udayton.edu (Tom Bell)
Message Hash: a249306eb38490f114c14a0708c26a3929a4042a33c6c638e110d9aa765f05d0
Message ID: <199510281800.LAA07028@netcom20.netcom.com>
Reply To: <14ADF0902256@odo.law.udayton.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-28 18:23:10 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 02:23:10 +0800

Raw message

From: cjs@netcom.com (cjs)
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 02:23:10 +0800
To: BELL@odo.law.udayton.edu (Tom Bell)
Subject: Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
In-Reply-To: <14ADF0902256@odo.law.udayton.edu>
Message-ID: <199510281800.LAA07028@netcom20.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> The 9/28/95 Congression Report states that Senators Hatch and Leahy
> have introduced a bill to amend the Copyright Act in accord with the
> suggestions of the recent White Paper on the National Information
> Infrastructure.  In relevant part, S. 1284: 1) makes transmission of
> copies a type of publication (and thus potentially a means of
> infringing a copyright); and 2) prohibits the importation,
> manufacture, or distribution of any device the primary purpose of
> which is to deactivate any technological protections that prevent or
> inhibit the violation of copyrights.
> 
> Though I can imagine cypherpunks objecting to the first of these two 
> provisions, I'm especially interested in how you regard the 
> second.

Its a mad mad mad mad mad world. I'd better order my cable descrambler
ahead of time.

Christopher






Thread