1995-10-23 - Re: FidoNet Remailer

Header Data

From: RobL <robl@on-ramp.ior.com>
To: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)
Message Hash: abb8390ba2d150de919ceaa0451aee61c69132b0471d8adf27f4e802949822da
Message ID: <m0t7Gp1-000RpFC@on-ramp.ior.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-23 06:57:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 22 Oct 95 23:57:43 PDT

Raw message

From: RobL <robl@on-ramp.ior.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 95 23:57:43 PDT
To: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)
Subject: Re: FidoNet Remailer
Message-ID: <m0t7Gp1-000RpFC@on-ramp.ior.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 04:34 PM 10/20/95 -0400, Jim Cannell wrote:
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>I have been a long time lurker on this list, as well as having a long time
>interest in crypto.  Most of my activity in this area has been on FidoNet
>rather than the internet.  Due to the control phreak nature of much of
>FidoNet, I've spent a lot of time and effort in an attempt to just simply
>route around the bastards.  I created the SecureMail system, which is a
>network of FidoNet nodes that agree to route any and all traffic without
>monitoring or censorship.  Within SecureMail, encrypted traffic is not
>only permitted, it is encouraged.


At the end of the month, I will be putting my BBS back online with new
software which is more Fido friendly than what I had been using.. I would be
interested in your SecureMail system as an alternative to the mind-numbing
strickness normally associated with FidoNet.. Any chance I can get more info?

Thanks-
RobL






Thread