1995-10-04 - Comments on STT Spec Implementation Details

Header Data

From: Rick Johnson <rickj@microsoft.com>
To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Message Hash: fe6be37927405fc7864b94f7b7efb85df18a0d9442425f94d8c8f55f01b9807f
Message ID: <9510040519.AA05397@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-04 04:16:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Oct 95 21:16:57 PDT

Raw message

From: Rick Johnson <rickj@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 95 21:16:57 PDT
To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Subject: Comments on STT Spec Implementation Details
Message-ID: <9510040519.AA05397@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Hi All -

Last week our team published jointly with Visa the STT specification.  
Since then, we've received some comments that the wire formats and 
protocols section for STT have not been complete enough for developers 
to implement.

We're very interested in feedback and specifics on this.  We worked to 
keep _only_ the detail we felt required to implement STT -- the 
language is intentionally terse.  However, it is in everyone's best 
interest that the STT spec is completely understood and implementable.

We want your participation in this.  We've set up an alias direct to 
our team to respond to your comments:

	stt@microsoft.com

Non-technical flames direct to:

Rick

 - aka -

Rick Johnson
rickj@microsoft.com







Thread