1995-11-30 - Re: ecash lottery (Was: ecash casino)

Header Data

From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 23dc9b726b93c5c22af5b51f480f7a375ed488475094767cd76389ca3cb21abb
Message ID: <v02120d45ace367e370bd@[199.0.65.105]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-30 14:41:40 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:41:40 +0800

Raw message

From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:41:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ecash lottery (Was: ecash casino)
Message-ID: <v02120d45ace367e370bd@[199.0.65.105]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 5:27 AM 11/30/95, Timothy C. May wrote:
<snip>
>My intuition (hand-waving) is that an anonymous lottery is possible, but I
>haven't looked at the details. Certainly multiple trusted holders of keys
>(escrow agents) would help make the lottery fair. Maybe bit commitment
>would help (each player buys the right to play, then "commits" his number.
>A public reading of the winning number occurs, and the winner can reveal
>his winning number (anonymously if he wishes, providing he had registered
>his hash....).

My bet it would work a lot like anonymous voting schemes would, though I
don't know how. It just feels like the same kind of thing...

Cheers,
Bob

-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com)
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA (617) 958-3971
"Reality is not optional." --Thomas Sowell
The NEW(!) e$ Home Page: http://thumper.vmeng.com/pub/rah/
>>>>Phree Phil: Email: zldf@clark.net  http://www.netresponse.com/zldf <<<<<







Thread