1995-11-14 - Re: DejaNews all over again

Header Data

From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2c4ddb0a211af27ad597cbfc6af35cae7881b1858bd9ef9acd148214e2f51ac9
Message ID: <199511131056.CAA06282@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-14 04:47:10 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:47:10 +0800

Raw message

From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:47:10 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DejaNews all over again
Message-ID: <199511131056.CAA06282@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 11 Nov 1995, Ray Cromwell wrote:

>> I think "Jeff" ... Mr. unofficial not speakng for the company Netscape
>> spokesperson, I think that you should rethink what you're suggesting. 
>> Your tactics won't serve your personal interests on this one.  I really
>> would recommend that you come clean.  This is not about "gloating".  I 
>> really take very little pleasure in this.
> 
>   Jeff, I think it's in your best interest to not waste your time
> responding to this moron (who bears many features in common with
> Detweiler)

I'm sure that most lawyers are probably advising Netscape's founders
to not respond -- just like Fuhrman, they should take the fifth
on this one. 

Hopefully everyone's D&O premiums are fully paid up ... 'cause to me this
smells like a failure to disclose a material event.  Netscape stock has
advanced almost 50% since the Bugs Bunny post. 

Some investors are gonna be mighty pissed.

Then again, what would I know ...



Alice de 'nonymous ...

                                  ...just another one of those...
                                                  ...hunters...

P.S.  This post is in the public domain.
                  C.  S.  U.  M.  O.  C.  L.  U.  N.  E.






Thread