1995-11-14 - Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: James Black <black@sunflash.eng.usf.edu>
Message Hash: 656164e8ab73f9fc7d9eaa57e599332e799dcc06f994c6adaf97adbf4c7e1396
Message ID: <199511142050.PAA05867@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951114144604.9607A-100000@sunflash.eng.usf.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-14 21:19:35 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 05:19:35 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 05:19:35 +0800
To: James Black <black@sunflash.eng.usf.edu>
Subject: Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951114144604.9607A-100000@sunflash.eng.usf.edu>
Message-ID: <199511142050.PAA05867@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



James Black writes:
>   I scanned through the ITAR, and I agree that there doesn't seem to be 
> anything about hooks that are illegal, but the NSA does have the 
> authority to protect whatever threatens national security.

Since when? They aren't a police agency. They have no power to arrest
or prosecute, and they don't even (directly) make any decisions on any
of this stuff (although they are responsible for the decisions that
made).

.pm





Thread