1995-11-30 - Re: Elliptic curves, patent status?

Header Data

From: anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8d470a9d8873d0e88c3f00d0dfe206187aad5233fdea23ffc100ae8307edb81d
Message ID: <199511300051.BAA26198@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Reply To: <199511290717.XAA29808@blob.best.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-30 01:09:32 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 09:09:32 +0800

Raw message

From: anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 09:09:32 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Elliptic curves, patent status?
In-Reply-To: <199511290717.XAA29808@blob.best.net>
Message-ID: <199511300051.BAA26198@utopia.hacktic.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Wei Dai (weidai@eskimo.com) wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
>
> > > [are there patents that cover all public key cryptography?]
> >
> > No, but RSA will litigate you with the objective of
> > inflicting extravagant legal costs regardless.
>
> RSADSI no longer owns the Stanford patents (Hellman-Merkel, 
> Diffie-Hellman) which they used to claim covered all public key 
> cryptography.  Those patents now belong to Cylink, who seems to be less 
> litigious.

Especially considering that they might lose the patents in a court case
next month.





Thread