1995-11-05 - Re: using PGP only for digital signatures

Header Data

From: “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
To: Cypherpunks <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Message Hash: 8f91e10c759f8c911fc37eff800dba36f3b004506861d5054e2af770bd5c079b
Message ID: <m0tBtCg-0004JWC@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951104151622.6970B-100000@chivalry>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-05 00:56:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 08:56:59 +0800

Raw message

From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 08:56:59 +0800
To: Cypherpunks <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: using PGP only for digital signatures
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951104151622.6970B-100000@chivalry>
Message-ID: <m0tBtCg-0004JWC@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Simon Spero writes:

: It seems that licences allowing foreign nationals access to cryptographic 
: software within the US are pretty easy to get, and especially for 
: something like PGP on a central machine. 

Really?

Would you please explain how one can apply for such a license?  To say
nothing about how one can actually get one?

Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
Internet:  junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu    junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu





Thread